Extended Abstract: Computational Models of Non-cooperative dialogue
نویسندگان
چکیده
Cooperativity is usually seen as a central concept in the pragmatics of dialogue. There are a number of accounts of dialogue performance and interpretation that require some notion of cooperation or collaboration as part of the explanatory mechanism of communication. For instance, Grice’s cooperativity principle and associated maxims are used to explain conversational implicature (Grice, 1975). Searle uses general principles of cooperative conversation to account for indirect speech acts (Searle, 1975). Clark and Wilkes-Gibbs use a principle of “least collaborative effort” as a goal of the processes of grounding and accepting referring expressions. (Clark and Wilkes-Gibbs, 1986). Alwood (Allwood, 1976) considers that fullblown communication requires at least some degree of cooperation, and defines ideal cooperation between a number of interacting normal rational agents as adherence to the following principles:
منابع مشابه
Non-Cooperation in Dialogue
This paper presents ongoing research on computational models for non-cooperative dialogue. We start by analysing different levels of cooperation in conversation. Then, inspired by findings from an empirical study, we propose a technique for measuring non-cooperation in political interviews. Finally, we describe a research programme towards obtaining a suitable model and discuss previous account...
متن کاملDesigning of Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism with Leadership Considering (RESEARCH NOTE)
Abstract Vertical cooperative (co-op) advertising is typically a cost sharing mechanism and coordinated effort by the channel’s members in order to increase demand and overall profits. In this marketing strategy, the manufacturer shares a fraction of the retailer’s advertising investment. This paper studies the advertising and pricing decisions in a retailer-manufacturer supply chain in which...
متن کاملLearning Better Trading Dialogue Policies by Inferring Opponent Preferences: (Extended Abstract)
Negotiation dialogue capabilities have been identified as important in a variety of application areas. In prior work, it was shown how Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents can learn to use implicit and explicit manipulation moves in dialogue to manipulate their adversaries in non-cooperative trading games. We now show that trading dialogues are more successful when the RL agent builds an opponent...
متن کاملCoordinating turn-taking with gaze
This paper explores the role of gaze in coordinating turn-taking in mixed-initiative conversation and specifically how gaze indicators might be usefully modeled in computational dialogue systems. We analyzed about 20 minutes of videotape of eight dialogues by four pairs of subjects performing a simple face-to-face cooperative laboratory task. We extend previous studies by explicating gaze patte...
متن کاملInvited talk: Computational Models of Non-cooperative Dialogue
Pedagogically motivated analyses of tutorial dialogue have identified recurring local sequences of exchanges which we propose to be analysed analogously to grounding structures. In this paper, we present a model describing such local structures in which a learner and a tutor collaboratively contribute to building a solution to a task. Such structures are modelled as “grounding” exchanges which ...
متن کامل